dynamic pricing
- South America > Chile > Santiago Metropolitan Region > Santiago Province > Santiago (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.28)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.14)
- North America > United States > Rhode Island > Providence County > Providence (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Barbara County > Santa Barbara (0.14)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Cook County > Chicago (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Philadelphia County > Philadelphia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Georgia > Fulton County > Atlanta (0.04)
- Europe > France > Île-de-France > Paris > Paris (0.04)
Dynamic Pricing with Monotonicity Constraint under Unknown Parametric Demand Model
We consider the Continuum Bandit problem where the goal is to find the optimal action under an unknown reward function, with an additional monotonicity constraint (or, markdown constraint) that requires that the action sequence be non-increasing. This problem faithfully models a natural single-product dynamic pricing problem, called markdown pricing, where the objective is to adaptively reduce the price over a finite sales horizon to maximize expected revenues. Jia et al '21 and Chen '21 independently showed a tight $T^{3/4}$ regret bound over $T$ rounds under *minimal* assumptions of unimodality and Lipschitzness in the reward (or, revenue) function. This bound shows that the demand learning in markdown pricing is harder than unconstrained (i.e., without the monotonicity constraint) pricing under unknown demand which suffers regret only of the order of $T^{2/3}$ under the same assumptions (Kleinberg '04). However, in practice the demand functions are usually assumed to have certain functional forms (e.g.
Can Disney Save Mickey from GenAI?
Disney strikes a deal with OpenAI, a few trillion dollar IPOs are brewing for 2026, and dynamic pricing is everywhere it seems. Please enable javascript to get your Slate Plus feeds. If you can't access your feeds, please contact customer support. Check your phone for a link to finish setting up your feed. Please enter a valid phone number.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence (1.00)
- Information Technology > Communications > Mobile (0.71)